1. Executive Summary: The End of Cheap Silicon

The global semiconductor landscape in late 2025 stands at a precipice of fundamental transformation, marked by a pricing crisis of unparalleled velocity and structural severity. For decades, the memory market—encompassing Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) and NAND Flash storage—operated on a predictable, albeit volatile, boom-and-bust cycle driven by personal computer (PC) and smartphone replacement rates. This cyclicality allowed for periods of acute oversupply, resulting in plunging prices that benefited consumer electronics manufacturers and end-users alike. However, the events of 2024 and 2025 have shattered this paradigm. The industry is currently in the grip of a “Great Memory Squeeze,” a phenomenon characterized not merely by a temporary supply-demand imbalance, but by a permanent structural pivoting of the world’s fabrication capacity toward the voracious demands of Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure.

As of the third quarter of 2025, the market has witnessed a startling 171.8% year-over-year increase in DRAM contract prices, an appreciation rate that has significantly outperformed traditional stores of value such as gold. This surge is pervasive, affecting everything from enterprise-grade server modules to the consumer-grade DDR5 kits used in gaming desktops. The pricing shock has been mirrored in the NAND Flash sector, where solid-state drive (SSD) prices have doubled in specific markets, driven by a synchronized tightening of wafer supply. The root cause is a “capacity cannibalization” effect: the physical floor space and silicon wafer input of the world’s major fabrication plants (fabs) are being aggressively reallocated to produce High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) for AI accelerators, leaving the traditional consumer markets starved of supply.

This report provides an exhaustive examination of this crisis. It analyzes the technical manufacturing bottlenecks inherent in HBM production that exacerbate scarcity; dissects the financial maneuvers of the “Big Three” memory producers—Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology—who have effectively rationed supply to drive record profitability; and evaluates the geopolitical ripple effects as China’s domestic champions, CXMT and YMTC, attempt to fill the void left by Western-aligned majors. Furthermore, it posits that the current pricing environment is not a transient bubble but the onset of a new “AI Supercycle,” implying that the era of commoditized, low-cost memory may be effectively over for the foreseeable future.

2. The Anatomy of the Surge: A Pricing Analysis of 2025

2.1. The Magnitude of the Price Shock

To fully grasp the severity of the 2025 memory crisis, one must look beyond the headline percentages and examine the granular pricing data that defined the year. The escalation began as a corrective measure in late 2024 following a period of post-pandemic inventory digestion, but it rapidly mutated into a runaway bullish market by mid-2025. The 171.8% aggregate increase in DRAM contract prices reported in Q3 2025 serves as a macroeconomic indicator, but the reality for specific product categories was far more volatile.

In the retail sector, the impact was immediate and punishing. A standard 32GB Corsair DDR5-6000 RAM kit, widely regarded as a benchmark for high-performance consumer computing, was trading at approximately $110 in the opening months of 2025. By November 2025, this same commodity commanded a price of $442—a quadrupling of cost in less than twelve months. This 300%+ increase far exceeds the headline contract rate because retail inventories are the first to evaporate when allocation becomes tight, forcing retailers to price against replacement costs that are rising daily.

The situation in the NAND Flash market paralleled this trajectory. After bottoming out in 2023, NAND pricing reversed with aggressive speed. By late 2025, consumer SSD prices had risen by approximately 100%. For instance, popular 1TB and 2TB NVMe drives from manufacturers like Samsung and Western Digital, which had become staples of budget PC builds, saw their price-per-gigabyte regress to levels not seen since the late 2010s. The 512Gb TLC (Triple Level Cell) NAND wafer, the raw material for many mainstream SSDs, saw spot price jumps of over 17% in single weeks during November 2025, signaling panic buying at the wholesale level.

2.2. Spot Market vs. Contract Market: The Spread of Panic

A critical feature of the 2025 crisis was the decoupling and subsequent collision of the spot and contract markets. Historically, the contract market—where large OEMs like Dell, HP, and Apple negotiate quarterly pricing—moves more slowly than the spot market. However, 2025 saw the spot market become a chaotic leading indicator of scarcity.

By November 2025, trend data indicated that spot prices for DDR5 chips had exploded by 307% since September, while legacy DDR4 chip spot prices increased by 158%. This extreme volatility in the spot market created a dangerous feedback loop. As spot prices skyrocketed, module manufacturers (the “middlemen” who buy chips from fabs to assemble into sticks of RAM) found their margins crushed. They were forced to halt quotations or offer prices valid for only 24 hours—a “daily pricing” regime reminiscent of hyperinflationary economies.

This environment led to bizarre market inversions. For a brief window, the price of individual DRAM chips on the spot market surpassed the price of assembled modules. This arbitrage anomaly signaled that the market was broken; it was more profitable to hold raw silicon than to sell a finished product. It forced module makers to aggressively hike prices to close the gap, resulting in the sudden price doublings observed by consumers in Q4 2025.

2.3. The End of the DDR4 Legacy Era

Perhaps the most disruptive aspect of the 2025 pricing surge was the fate of DDR4 memory. As the industry transitioned to the newer DDR5 standard, conventional wisdom suggested that DDR4 would become cheaper and more abundant as it entered its “legacy” phase. The 2025 market defied this logic completely.

Driven by the need to clear floor space for high-margin products, major manufacturers aggressively deprioritized DDR4 production. Samsung, the dominant player in the sector, reportedly planned to reduce its DDR4 production capacity to just 20% of its 2025 levels by 2026. This rapid, forced obsolescence created a supply shock. Industries that rely on long-lifecycle components—such as industrial automation, automotive, and budget consumer electronics—suddenly found themselves bidding for a dwindling pool of “legacy” chips.

The result was a stunning reversal of value: by mid-2025, the cost per gigabit of DDR4 overtook that of DDR5 for the first time. The “budget” option had become the premium option due to artificial scarcity. This inversion forced PC builders and OEMs into a difficult corner: stick with the older platform and pay a scarcity tax, or upgrade to the newer DDR5 platform, which was itself experiencing inflationary pressure.

Metric	Q1 2025 (Pre-Surge)	Q3 2025 (Crisis Peak)	YoY Variance	Primary Driver
DRAM Contract Index	100.0	271.8	+171.8%	AI Capacity Reallocation
DDR5-6000 Kit (32GB)	~$110	~$442	+301%	Retail Panic / Scarcity
SSD Price Index (1TB)	~$60	~$120+	+100%	NAND Wafer Shortage
DDR5 Chip Spot Price	Baseline	+307% vs Sept	High	Speculative Hoarding
DDR4 Chip Spot Price	Baseline	+158% vs Sept	High	Production Cuts / EOL

Table 1: Comparative analysis of key memory pricing metrics throughout 2025, highlighting the divergence between contract stability and spot market volatility.

3. The Technical Driver: Why AI Breaks the Supply Chain

To understand why prices have risen so sharply, one must look inside the fabrication plants. The crisis is not simply about “high demand”; it is about the physics of manufacturing High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) versus commodity DRAM, and how the former is cannibalizing the latter.

3.1. The HBM Capacity Black Hole

High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), specifically the HBM3e and upcoming HBM4 generations, is the lifeblood of modern AI accelerators like Nvidia’s Blackwell architecture. However, HBM is notoriously inefficient to manufacture compared to standard DDR5.

First, HBM dies are physically larger than standard DRAM dies to accommodate the massive I/O (Input/Output) channels required for high-speed data transfer. This means fewer chips can be printed on a single 300mm silicon wafer. Second, HBM utilizes a 3D stacked architecture, where multiple DRAM dies are vertically stacked and connected via Through-Silicon Vias (TSVs). This stacking process introduces multiple points of failure. If one die in an 8-high or 12-high stack is defective, the entire stack may be rendered useless or require expensive repair steps.

Industry data reveals that producing one bit of HBM capacity requires approximately three times the wafer capacity of producing one bit of standard commodity DRAM. This 3:1 ratio is the mathematical heart of the shortage. When a manufacturer like SK Hynix shifts 10,000 wafers per month of capacity from DDR5 to HBM to satisfy Nvidia, the market effectively loses 30,000 wafers’ worth of commodity bit supply.

In 2025, as hyperscalers demanded exponentially more HBM, manufacturers converted massive swathes of their production lines. This conversion created a “capacity black hole.” The total number of wafers processed by the industry didn’t necessarily drop, but the bit output available for PCs and Smartphones collapsed. This is a structural reduction in supply, not a temporary logistics issue.

3.2. The Yield Challenge of Advanced Nodes

Compounding the capacity displacement is the difficulty of transitioning to newer manufacturing nodes. The industry is currently moving to the 1-beta (1β) and 1-gamma (1γ) process nodes, which utilize Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. These advanced nodes offer higher density and power efficiency but come with steep yield learning curves.

Samsung, in particular, reportedly faced yield challenges with its HBM3e product validation for Nvidia, forcing it to iterate its manufacturing process aggressively. Every wafer used for engineering validation or lost to low yields is a wafer that did not become a saleable product. This friction in the technology transition acts as a drag on total supply growth. Unlike previous cycles where “shrinking” the chip instantly created more supply, the complexity of modern 3D structures (both in HBM and 300+ layer 3D NAND) means that bit growth is slowing down even as investment rises.

3.3. NAND Flash: The Layer Count Trap

A similar dynamic afflicts the NAND Flash market. To increase storage density, manufacturers have been racing to stack memory cells higher—moving from 176 layers to 232 layers, and now targeting 300+ layers. However, etching these microscopic skyscrapers into silicon is fraught with difficulty. The “aspect ratio” of the etch becomes so extreme that manufacturing defects rise, and throughput (the speed at which wafers move through the fab) slows down.

In 2025, manufacturers like Micron and SK Hynix maintained a “cautious” approach to Capital Expenditure (CapEx) for NAND. Burned by the memory crash of 2023, they refused to build new NAND fabs, preferring to upgrade existing lines. This discipline, combined with the technical difficulty of the new nodes, meant that when AI data centers started demanding massive amounts of Enterprise SSDs (eSSDs) for data lakes, there was no surge capacity available. The result was an immediate and sharp spike in wafer prices, as seen with the 17% weekly jumps in Q4 2025.

4. Corporate Strategy: The “Profitability Over Volume” Paradigm

The 2025 memory crisis is also a story of changed corporate behavior. The “Big Three” memory makers—Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron—have fundamentally altered their strategic priorities, moving from a market-share-driven model to a profit-maximization model.

4.1. Financial Performance: The AI Windfall

The financial results from Q3 and Q4 2025 confirm that the shortage is generating windfall profits for the manufacturers, validating their strategy of supply discipline.

• SK Hynix: As the primary supplier of HBM to Nvidia, SK Hynix posted record-breaking results. In Q3 2025, the company reported an operating profit of 11.38 trillion won (approx. $8 billion), a number that would have been unthinkable during the commodity-focused years. Their revenue grew 94% year-over-year, driven almost entirely by the high average selling prices (ASPs) of AI memory products.
• Samsung Electronics: Despite facing stronger competition, Samsung’s memory division recorded its highest-ever quarterly sales in Q3 2025. The company explicitly cited the sales of HBM3e and high-density server SSDs as the drivers. Notably, Samsung’s operating margin on standard DRAM jumped to roughly 40% in Q3 2025, while its margin on premium HBM chips reached a staggering 60%. This margin differential incentivizes the company to continue diverting resources away from the consumer sector.
• Micron Technology: The sole US-based major memory manufacturer guided for fiscal Q1 2026 revenue of $8.7 billion, smashing analyst estimates. Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra confirmed that the company’s HBM capacity for the entirety of 2025 and much of 2026 was already sold out.

4.2. Strategic Rationing and “Double Booking”

Market behavior in 2025 suggests that manufacturers engaged in strategic rationing. By halting quotations and moving to daily pricing, suppliers effectively auctioned their limited inventory to the highest bidders. This behavior forced distributors and OEMs into a panic.

Reports of “double-ordering” and “triple-ordering” emerged, where PC manufacturers would place redundant orders with multiple distributors hoping to get some allocation. This is a classic bullwhip effect; it artificially inflates demand signals, encouraging manufacturers to keep prices high. However, unlike previous cycles where this led to a glut, the physical constraints of HBM production mean that supply cannot easily ramp up to meet this phantom demand. The “glut” that usually follows such panic buying is likely postponed until the HBM capacity constraints are resolved, which analysts do not expect until 2027.

4.3. The CapEx Discipline

Crucially, despite record profits, the memory makers are not embarking on reckless capacity expansion for commodity chips. CapEx is rising, but it is targeted almost exclusively at HBM packaging and advanced node migration, not at increasing the total number of wafer starts for DDR5 or NAND. This “CapEx discipline” is a learned behavior from the 2023 downturn. Manufacturers are prioritizing free cash flow and profitability over market share dominance. For the consumer, this means that the “relief valve” of new supply coming online is tighter than in any previous cycle.

5. The Demand Side: The “Stargate” Effect and Hyperscaler Dominance

The narrative of the 2025 memory crisis cannot be told without addressing the monolithic demand of the “Hyperscalers”—the tech giants building the AI infrastructure of the future.

5.1. The “Stargate” Project and Mega-Deals

A singular event that crystallized the scale of AI demand was the rumored “Stargate” infrastructure project by OpenAI and Microsoft. Reports surfaced in late 2025 that this project alone had locked down agreements with Samsung and SK Hynix for up to 900,000 DRAM wafers monthly. While the precise accuracy of this figure is subject to industry debate, the implication is undeniable: single commercial entities now wield purchasing power equivalent to entire nation-states.

If a single project secures 40% of global DRAM supply (or even a significant fraction thereof) for a multi-year period, the rest of the market is fighting for scraps. This creates a two-tier market: the “AI Tier,” which gets guaranteed supply at fixed (high) prices, and the “Consumer Tier,” which relies on the volatile spot market for whatever is left.

5.2. From Training to Inference: The Edge AI Pivot

Throughout 2024, the focus was on “training” AI models, which occurs in massive data centers. In 2025, the focus shifted to “inference”—the actual running of these models—and “Edge AI” (running AI on smartphones and PCs). This shift was disastrous for memory pricing.

AI-capable PCs and smartphones require significantly more RAM to run local models (Small Language Models or SLMs). The industry standard for a “copilot-ready” PC shifted from 8GB to 16GB or 32GB of RAM. Similarly, AI smartphones require 12GB to 16GB of LPDDR5X memory. This means that just as supply was contracting due to HBM displacement, the per-unit memory requirement for every laptop and phone sold increased by 50-100%. This multiplier effect on demand exacerbated the shortage, particularly for high-performance LPDDR modules.

6. Downstream Impact: The Consumer and Enterprise Squeeze

The shockwaves from the upstream manufacturing bottlenecks have caused severe disruption in downstream markets, affecting everything from gaming consoles to smartphone production.

6.1. The Personal Computing and DIY Market

The PC enthusiast market, often the most price-sensitive segment, has been battered.

• The $1200 Threshold: A mid-range PC build that cost $800-$1000 in early 2025 approached $1200 by year’s end, solely due to RAM and SSD inflation. This destroys the value proposition of PC gaming relative to consoles, although consoles themselves are not immune.
• Retail Rationing in Japan: The situation in Japan provided a dystopian glimpse of the shortage. Major electronics retailers in Akihabara began capping the quantity of HDDs, SSDs, and RAM that a single customer could buy. This rationing was driven by a lack of delivery certainty; shops did not know when their next shipment would arrive.
• System Integrators: Companies like CyberPowerPC and other pre-built PC vendors were forced to announce price hikes in late 2025, citing a 500% increase in their memory costs. For the holiday season of 2025, this meant consumers paid significantly more for the same hardware specifications as the previous year.

6.2. The Smartphone Sector: Margin Compression

For smartphone manufacturers, memory accounts for a significant portion of the Bill of Materials (BOM)—typically 10-15%. With DRAM prices up 75% YoY in Q4 2025, the total cost of manufacturing a smartphone rose by approximately 8-10%.

• Xiaomi’s Warning: High-profile executives, such as Xiaomi founder Lei Jun, publicly acknowledged the surge, signaling to consumers that price hikes were inevitable.
• Strategic Shifts: TrendForce analysis suggests that manufacturers will respond by cutting production of low-margin entry-level phones. Instead, they will focus on premium models where the higher BOM cost can be passed on to the consumer or absorbed by higher margins. This effectively raises the “entry price” of a smartphone for the average global consumer.
• Forecast Revisions: Consequently, global smartphone production forecasts for 2026 were revised downward from growth to a contraction (-2%), as higher prices are expected to dampen demand in price-sensitive developing markets.

6.3. Gaming Consoles: The Mid-Cycle Crisis

The console market faces a unique dilemma. Consoles like the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X rely on fixed hardware specifications and typically see price reductions over time. The memory crisis has inverted this trend.

• Nintendo Switch 2: The launch of Nintendo’s next-generation console was impacted by the pricing surge. Reports indicate a launch price of $450—higher than its predecessor—necessitated by the doubled memory capacity and the high cost of components.
• BOM Bloat: For Sony and Microsoft, memory costs were projected to exceed 35% of the total BOM by 2026. This effectively kills the possibility of a “Slim” model price cut. Instead, Microsoft was rumored to be considering raising the price of Xbox consoles in certain regions to compensate. This threatens the traditional console business model, which relies on cheap hardware to drive software sales.

7. Geopolitics and the Rise of “Red Supply”

As the Western-aligned supply chain tightens, the role of China’s domestic semiconductor industry has become a critical, if complicated, variable.

7.1. CXMT and YMTC: Filling the Void?

China’s national champions, ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) for DRAM and Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. (YMTC) for NAND, have aggressively expanded capacity in defiance of U.S. export controls.

• YMTC’s Ascendance: YMTC was projected to increase its NAND wafer production to 1.51 million wafers in 2025, surpassing U.S. giant Micron. By utilizing domestic toolchains and state subsidies, YMTC has managed to scale production of 200+ layer 3D NAND.
• CXMT’s Market Grab: CXMT captured approximately 30% of the Chinese domestic LPDDR market for smartphones. They also unveiled domestic DDR5 chips running at 8000 Mbps, proving they can compete on performance, if not yet on yield.

7.2. The Bifurcation of the Global Market

The presence of this “Red Supply” creates a bifurcated global market.

• The Domestic Buffer: For Chinese OEMs like Lenovo, Xiaomi, and Huawei, the availability of CXMT and YMTC chips provides a buffer against the global price surge. They can source a portion of their memory domestically, mitigating the impact of the global shortage.
• The Western Constraint: For Western companies (Dell, HP, Apple), utilizing these Chinese chips is fraught with regulatory risk due to U.S. Entity List restrictions and security concerns. Thus, the Western market remains tightly constrained and expensive, while the Chinese domestic market operates with a slightly different supply-demand curve.
• Supply Chain Fragility: The “Nexperia Incident” in late 2025, where the Dutch government forced a split of the semiconductor firm to limit Chinese influence, highlights the fragility of cross-border semiconductor trade. Such geopolitical interventions add a “risk premium” to memory prices, as procurement teams must hedge against sudden trade blocks.

8. Future Outlook: 2026-2028 and the “Supercycle” Debate

The critical question facing the industry is: How long will this last? Is this a temporary spike, or the new normal?

8.1. 2026: The Year of Shortage

Consensus forecasts for 2026 are grim for consumers. Team Group’s General Manager predicted that the memory shortage would worsen in the first half of 2026 as the last remaining distribution stockpiles are exhausted. With no major new fabs coming online until late 2027, the structural deficit will persist.

• Price Trajectory: Projections suggest that DDR5 prices could continue to rise by 30-50% quarter-over-quarter through early 2026.
• HBM4 Transition Risk: The industry’s transition to HBM4 in 2026 poses a major risk. HBM4 requires even more complex packaging (hybrid bonding with logic dies). If yields are low, it will consume even more wafer capacity, deepening the hole for commodity DRAM.

8.2. The “Supercycle” Thesis

Analysts at Morgan Stanley and S&P Global imply that we are in an “AI Supercycle.” Unlike previous cycles driven by consumer gadgets, this cycle is driven by Trillion-dollar infrastructure investment. As long as the AI CapEx boom continues, memory makers will prioritize high-margin AI products. This suggests a “higher for longer” pricing regime where memory is priced as a strategic resource rather than a commodity.

8.3. The Bear Case: The Bubble Risk

However, skepticism remains. The memory market has a history of “crying wolf” regarding supercycles (e.g., 2017-2018). If the monetization of AI fails to materialize for the hyperscalers—if the “AI Bubble” bursts—demand for HBM could collapse overnight. In that scenario, the massive capacity currently allocated to HBM would flood back into the commodity market, causing a price crash. Yet, analysts caution that even in a crash, the “floor” price would be higher than in 2023 due to the significantly higher manufacturing costs of EUV-based nodes.

9. Conclusion

The memory price increase of 2025 is a watershed moment for the technology industry. It represents the decoupling of the semiconductor supply chain from the consumer cycle and its realignment around the imperatives of Artificial Intelligence. The 171.8% surge in DRAM prices and the doubling of SSD costs are not anomalies; they are the market pricing in the high resource cost of the AI revolution.

For the consumer, the era of cheap, abundant memory is effectively over for the near term. The “Great Memory Squeeze” will define the economics of electronics through 2026 and likely into 2027. Consumers and enterprises alike must adapt to a reality where digital storage and memory are scarce, expensive, and strategically rationed. The silicon that powers our devices has ceased to be a commodity—it has become the oil of the 21st century, priced accordingly.

Works cited

1. DRAM prices are spiking, but I don’t trust the industry’s reasons why, https://www.xda-developers.com/dram-prices-spiking-dont-trust-industry-reasons/

2. RAM prices have increased ‘500%,’ PC builder claims — CyberPowerPC announces price hikes in U.S. and UK starting December 7 | Tom’s Hardware, https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/dram/cyberpowerpc-announces-ram-price-hikes-coming-to-the-u-s-and-the-uk-starting-december-7th-prebuilt-proprietor-cites-500-percent-increase-in-memory-cost

3. [Insights] Memory Spot Price Update: DRAM Chip Spot Prices Surpass Modules, Signaling Imminent Surge – TrendForce, https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/11/12/insights-memory-spot-price-update-dram-chip-prices-surpass-module-prices-signaling-imminent-surge/

4. [Insights] Memory Spot Price Update: DDR5 Prices Up 307% Since September as Module Costs Poised to Surge, https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/11/19/insights-memory-spot-price-update-ddr5-prices-up-307-since-september-as-module-costs-poised-to-surge/

5. [News] Memory Makers Reportedly Halt Quotes on Select DRAM, NAND Products as China Faces “Daily Pricing” – TrendForce, https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/10/27/news-memory-makers-reportedly-halt-quotes-on-select-dram-nand-products-as-china-faces-daily-pricing/

6. [News] Samsung Reportedly Plans Q4 Memory Price Hikes: DRAM Up 30%, NAND Up 10%, https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/09/22/news-samsung-reportedly-plans-q4-memory-price-hikes-dram-up-30-nand-up-10/

7. DDR4 vs DDR5 Memory Pricing Trends 2025 – PCSP (PC Server & Parts), https://pcserverandparts.com/blog/ddr4-vs-ddr5-memory-pricing-trends-2025/

8. Memory Supercycle: How AI’s HBM Hunger Is Squeezing DRAM (and What to Own), https://medium.com/@Elongated_musk/memory-supercycle-how-ais-hbm-hunger-is-squeezing-dram-and-what-to-own-79c316f89586

9. When Will RAM Prices Drop? Global Memory Market Outlook 2024–2026 – BaCloud.com, https://www.bacloud.com/en/blog/230/when-will-ram-prices-drop-global-memory-market-outlook-20242026.html

10. Memory industry to maintain cautious capex in 2026 – Evertiq, https://evertiq.com/news/2025-11-13-memory-industry-to-maintain-cautious-capex-in-2026

11. SK hynix logs record profit in Q3 on AI chip boom – The Korea Herald, https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10603655

12. Samsung Electronics (SSNLF) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript – MLQ.ai, https://mlq.ai/stocks/SSNLF/earnings-call-transcript/Q3-2025/

13. Micron Technology, Inc. Reports Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year of Fiscal 2025, https://investors.micron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/micron-technology-inc-reports-results-fourth-quarter-and-full-8

14. NAND and DRAM prices surge by up to 20% — contract price increases driven by AI demands and tight supply | Tom’s Hardware, https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/nand-and-dram-prices-spike-in-q42025

15. Memory Shortage Just Started, Major Price Hikes Ahead, Warns Team Group, https://www.techpowerup.com/343518/memory-shortage-just-started-major-price-hikes-ahead-warns-team-group

16. The Great RAM Raid: How One AI Deal Broke the Consumer Memory Market – Implicator.ai, https://www.implicator.ai/the-great-ram-raid-how-one-ai-deal-broke-the-consumer-memory-market/

17. Memory price surge forces Korea PC makers to delay launches or cut specs – CHOSUNBIZ, https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-it/2025/12/01/LBUETEDJQFBRLG7XJ7EUFH2WFI/

18. Rising Memory Prices Weigh on Consumer Markets; 2026 Smartphone and Notebook Outlook Revised Downward, Says TrendForce, https://www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20251117-12784.html

19. Rising memory prices weigh on consumer markets, https://evertiq.com/news/2025-11-18-rising-memory-prices-weigh-on-consumer-markets

20. Rising memory prices force console makers to rethink pricing, https://evertiq.com/news/2025-12-02-rising-memory-prices-force-console-makers-to-rethink-pricing

21. Memory Price Surge Squeezes Game Console Margins; 2026 Shipment Forecast Revised Downward, https://www.techpowerup.com/343548/memory-price-surge-squeezes-game-console-margins-2026-shipment-forecast-revised-downward

22. YMTC expected to outproduce Micron in NAND flash while SK hynix cuts output – Chosunbiz, https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-it/2025/05/16/I7XUWDAC5JACLPTZC4AP725LFU/

23. China’s CXMT Takes Aim at Global Leaders With High-End DDR5 Memory Chips, https://www.caixinglobal.com/2025-11-26/chinas-cxmt-takes-aim-at-global-leaders-with-high-end-ddr5-memory-chips-102386784.html

24. China’s CXMT debuts new speedy DDR5 memory amid global shortage, https://cybernews.com/tech/china-debuts-high-frequency-dram-chips/

25. 2026 Semiconductor Industry Market Outlook | Sourceability, https://sourceability.com/post/whats-ahead-in-2026-for-the-semiconductor-industry

26. The RAM pricing crisis has only just started, Team Group GM warns — says problem will get worse in 2026 as DRAM and NAND prices double in one month, https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/dram/the-ram-pricing-crisis-has-only-just-started-team-group-gm-warns-says-problem-will-get-worse-in-2026-as-dram-and-nand-prices-double-in-one-month

27. Samsung Electronics Announces Third Quarter 2025 Results, https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-announces-third-quarter-2025-results

28. Micron Technology Inc. Outlook Revised To Positiv | S&P Global Ratings, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3486710

29. Early Surge or Late Grind for U.S. Stocks? – Morgan Stanley, https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/articles/2026-economy-business-cycle